ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Trends and variation in the use of andexanet alfa for the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in NHS trusts in England.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Andexanet Alfa Withdrawn from the US: Implications for Intracranial Hemorrhage Care.CNS drugs · 2026Article
- Trends and variation in the use of andexanet alfa for the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in NHS trusts in England.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Chemical Synthesis and Biochemical Evaluation of Decasulfated Galloylglucopyranose Heparin Mimetic.Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsAndexanet alfa was recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as an option in the management of life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban in May 2021. A recent UK-wide survey of local hospital protocols for the use of andexanet alfa suggested that practice across the United Kingdom is highly variable. In January 2025, NICE was unable to make a recommendation on the use of andexanet alfa for reversing anticoagulation in adults with intracranial haemorrhage. We set out to report trends and variation in the uptake of andexanet alfa across the NHS in England, using the new OpenPrescribing Hospitals platform.
methodsTo assess the uptake of andexanet alfa, we analysed pharmacy stock control data from NHS trusts in England using the openly available Secondary Care Medicines Dataset. Analysis was restricted to NHS trusts with 24-h consultant-led emergency care activity.
resultsBetween May 2021 and June 2025, 19 608 vials of andexanet alfa were issued in NHS trusts in England. There was wide variation in the timing and speed of uptake across NHS trusts. Substantial variation was also observed between NHS Regions in England.
conclusionsThe use of andexanet alfa varies markedly between NHS regions and between NHS trusts in England. This study is the first analysis of adoption of a new treatment using the OpenPrescribing Hospitals platform, which is expected to provide a generalizable framework for similar analyses in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.