ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Low-intervention clinical trials in Spain: Do they progress?
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-intervention clinical trials in Spain: Do they progress?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsLow-Intervention Clinical Trials (LICTs) are generally pragmatic trials that investigate medicinal products already authorized for use. In 2014, simplified regulatory frameworks were introduced for LICTs with the aim of reducing regulatory burden and operational complexity, to foster non-commercial clinical trials (NCCTs); the mandatory implementation of CTIS in 2023 may have impacted LICTs feasibility. Our aim was to describe the main characteristics of LICTs approved in Spain over a ten-year period.
methodsCross-sectional descriptive analysis of LICTs registered between 2014 and 2023, in the Spanish Clinical Studies Registry (REec) database, mandatory to all authorized trials.
resultsBetween January 2014 and December 2023, 8497 clinical trials were registered in REec, of which only 3.8% (N = 322) were classified as LICTs. No drop in the overall proportion of LICTs was seen in 2023. Most LICTs were sponsored by non-commercial entities and funded primarily through sponsors' own resources. LICTs were frequently monocentric phase IV studies evaluating commercialized medicinal products. The principal objectives of the trials included efficacy and/or safety, while pharmacoeconomics, pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics and bioequivalence were comparatively infrequent as main objectives. Most trial designs were randomized, but blinded trials were less frequent, and only a minority were placebo-controlled.
conclusionsDespite their critical role in establishing effectiveness and safety of authorized medicinal products in pragmatic clinical settings, LICTs still constitute a relatively small proportion of all clinical trials approved in Spain, and their designs have area for improvement in terms of robustness. There was no apparent effect of CTIS implementation on LICTs activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.