ArticleCell reports. Medicine2025
Systemic and mucosal immune signatures of protection against SARS-CoV-2 transmission in humans.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomaterials for the Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of Pharyngeal Human Papillomavirus Infection: A Translational Roadmap.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hitting the hidden: arming the immune system for the next zoonotic coronavirus spillover.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Early Fc-effector antibody signatures impact COVID-19 disease trajectory.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity of Airborne Virus Transmission in the Built Environment: A Narrative Review.Pathogens & immunity · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Binding and neutralizing antibodies against the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 have been associated with a reduced risk of symptomatic infection. However, precise immune protection thresholds remain unclear. We aim to define systemic and mucosal antibody correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our household COVID-19 cohort (the CIDS) consists of 52 families (52 index cases and 139 exposed contacts). Immunoglobulin subtyping against S of SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-OC43 in the serum and upper respiratory tract is quantified to assess the protection provided by virus-specific pre-existing immunity. Logistic regression analyses indicate that multiple antibody isotypes are associated with reduced infection risk. Specifically, multivariable models show that systemic anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG and anti-OC43 S2 IgM independently correlate with protection. Besides, local mucosal anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgG and HCoV-OC43 S IgA antibodies add protective potential. However, an integrated analysis reveals that systemic antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 remain the best predictor against virus infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.