ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Valvular Heart Disease Associations With Cardiac Biomarkers Using AI-Guided Echocardiography: The RURAL Cohort Study.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating Biomarkers Related to Mitral Valve Prolapse: Current Evidence and Mechanistic Perspective.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have evaluated the prevalence or severity of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and other valvular heart disease (VHD) in the rural U.S. South, where strategies for early detection are crucial for risk stratification and prevention.
objectivesWe assessed the prevalence of MVP and other VHD in a rural U.S. South cohort and examined associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We also evaluated associations between MVP severity, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis from the Risk Underlying Rural Areas Longitudinal study. Logistic regression assessed associations between participant characteristics and MVP, other VHD, or either. Weighted models assessed odds for MVP and other VHD by 10-year CVD risk categories using the Predicting Risk of CVD Events (PREVENT) score. Among a subset, we evaluated associations between MVP severity and cardiac biomarkers.
resultsAmong 2,621 participants (68.7% women), MVP and other VHD were present in 1.9% and 11.2%, respectively. Compared to the low PREVENT risk group, odds of MVP were lower and odds of VHD were higher among borderline and intermediate/high groups. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T was lower in MVP vs non-MVP (0.64; 95% CI: 0.58-0.71), without difference by severity of MVP. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was higher in participants with severe MVP than non-MVP (2.03; 95% CI: 1.49-2.78).
conclusionsMVP prevalence aligned with population-based epidemiologic studies. PREVENT risk category may identify individuals at higher risk for MVP and for other VHD. Future studies are needed to evaluate relationships between MVP/VHD status and clinical events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.