ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Detecting Bicuspid Aortic Valve From Echocardiographic Reports Using Natural Language Processing: A Veterans Affairs Study.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect but often evades timely diagnosis due to variable clinical presentations. Prior to October 2024, no specific diagnosis code existed for BAV, limiting retrospective identification.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to develop and validate a natural language processing (NLP) system for automated extraction of heart valve morphology from echocardiographic reports, with focus on BAV detection.
methodsWe developed a rule-based NLP system using MedSpaCy to analyze echocardiographic reports from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. The system was trained on 555 manually annotated reports and validated on 170 held-out reports. System performance was evaluated on valve leaflet structure identification.
resultsThe NLP system achieved excellent performance for BAV detection with a precision of 0.925, a sensitivity of 0.939, and an F1-score of 0.932. When applied to 14,453,591 echocardiographic documents from 3,478,658 patients, the system identified 83,461 patients (2.40%) with affirmed BAV. Among patients identified by the International Classification of Diseases-10 code Q23.81, NLP showed 86.1% concordance, with manual review confirming NLP accuracy in discordant cases.
conclusionsThis NLP approach enables large-scale retrospective identification of BAV patients from clinical text, creating the largest BAV cohort to date and facilitating future cardiovascular research and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.