ArticleTranslational oncology2026
Exploration of precise classification and therapeutic targets of breast cancer based on genes related to neuro-cancer crosstalk.
Article in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This investigation examines neural-cancer crosstalk in breast cancer, utilizing TCGA/GEO transcriptomic and single-cell data to develop a neural-cancer crosstalk prognostic signature and evaluate its clinical relevance. We identified four core genes-L1CAM, TACR1, GFRA1, and NTRK3-using univariate Cox regression and LASSO-Cox regression to develop a risk scoring model. The prognostic signature showed consistent predictive accuracy across validation cohorts, with high-risk patients demonstrating markedly reduced survival. Multivariate analysis established the risk score as an independent prognostic indicator. Immune profiling identified an immunosuppressive phenotype in high-risk cases, featuring elevated Treg infiltration and impaired antigen presentation. Genomic analysis revealed significantly higher TP53 mutation frequency in high-risk versus low-risk patients. Drug sensitivity predictions indicated that the high-risk group exhibited increased sensitivity to targeted therapies such as Lapatinib, but enhanced resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Single-cell sequencing revealed the heterogeneity of breast cancer cells and elucidated a neuro-immune-tumor interaction network dominated by MIF and MDK signaling pathways. Functional validation studies demonstrated that L1CAM knockdown effectively suppressed malignant phenotypes in breast cancer cells, including proliferation, migration, and invasive capacity in vitro. This study provides new insights into the regulatory mechanisms of the neural microenvironment in breast cancer, and the established prognostic model and identified potential therapeutic targets hold significant clinical implications for personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.