ArticlePoultry science2026
Research note: Impacts on turkey health when fed titrating reduced energy diets with an energy sparing feed additive.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The source of energy in turkey diets is one of the highest feed costs per unit to turkey producers. Reducing the cost by reducing energy concentration in a turkey diet while maintaining performance and health would economically benefit turkey producers. The reduction of energy may, however, impact immune competency, metabolism, and bone structure by diverting energy to sustain growth. This study evaluated the effects of the addition of a commercial energy sparing feed additive (ESFA) product. Dietary treatments included a control diet (CON) and 3 experimental diets with reduced calories to equal a 50 kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 1), 70 kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 2), and 100 kcal/kg deficit (ESFA 3) with the addition of (Enercore®, Biosen) at 1 kg/tonne. Toms were placed on experimental diets from placement through 18 wk of age. At 17 wks of age, one tom from each pen was weighed and euthanized to determine health indicator status which included bone ash from the right thigh bone, spleen weight to examine potential shifts in the immune system, plasma ketone body concentrations, liver weight and liver score, and small intestine morphology. Tom live weights (P = 0.937), liver score (P = 0.248), ketone body concentration (P = 0.997), small intestine morphology (P > 0.120) and bone ash (P = 0.156) were similar across dietary treatments. In contrast, relative spleen weight was altered by dietary treatment (P = 0.044) with ESFA 3 spleen yield significantly less than CON (P = 0.005). In conclusion, the removal of 50 and 70 kcal/kg of energy in turkey diets supplemented with an energy sparing feed additive did not significantly alter body weight or metabolic traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.