ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Enhancing Parenting Using AI: Exploratory Hackathon.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParenting skills programs are the primary intervention for conduct disorders in children. The Pause app enhances these programs by providing digital microinterventions that reinforce learning between sessions and after program completion. The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in this context remains untapped. Hackathons have proven effective for health care innovation and can facilitate collaborative development in this space.
objectiveWe aimed to rapidly build AI-powered features in the Pause app to enhance parenting skills.
methodsWe undertook a 1-day hackathon that included an ideation phase drawing on the Design Council's double diamond framework and a development phase using microsprints based on agile and scrum approaches. The interdisciplinary participants included medical professionals, developers, and product managers.
resultsParticipants identified 3 core problems: generating age-appropriate distractions, receiving feedback on parenting efforts, and effectively using the journal function. During the solution phase, a wide range of options were explored, resulting in 3 key solutions: AI-assisted idea generation, a tool for summarizing parenting interactions, and a weekly journal roundup. During the development phase, participants completed 4 microsprints. Teams focused on 3 workstreams: building a "weekly roundup" module, creating an AI-based distraction generator, and developing a summarizer for active play sessions. These prototypes were integrated into the preproduction environment, with each workstream producing a functional component. Participant feedback (n=4) was unanimously positive, with all participants rating the event as "excellent" and highlighting the value of in-person collaboration.
conclusionsThis 1-day hackathon used the double diamond approach to develop AI-powered features for parenting programs. Three solutions were explored across workstreams, resulting in 2 fully functioning and 1 near-functioning app component. The rapid problem-solving approach mirrors other health technology hackathons and highlights the untapped potential of AI in digital parenting support, surpassing traditional e-learning or video-based methods. This work suggests broader applications of AI-driven coaching in fields like social care. Despite a small team, the hackathon was focused and productive, generating relevant solutions based on prior engagement with parents and practitioners. Future research will assess the impact of the app's AI-powered features on parenting outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.