Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41406461›Full record

ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2025

Application of Machine Learning to Auto-Code Injury Data in the e-CHIRPP System: Development and Evaluation Study.

Shamir N Mukhi, Steven R McFaull, Wendy Thompson, Tim Beattie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shamir N MukhiCanadian Network for Public Health Intelligence, Public Health Agency of Canada, 9700 Jasper Ave, Edmonton, AB, T5J 4C3, Canada, 1-204-771-4698.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8245-1127
Steven R McFaullCanadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2238-132X
Wendy ThompsonCanadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-998X
Tim BeattieCanadian Network for Public Health Intelligence, Public Health Agency of Canada, 9700 Jasper Ave, Edmonton, AB, T5J 4C3, Canada, 1-204-771-4698.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-0592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program (CHIRPP), a Public Health Agency of Canada program established in 1990, is an injury and poisoning sentinel surveillance system that collects and analyzes data on injuries to individuals who are seen at the emergency departments of numerous pediatric and general hospitals in Canada. Since its inception, the program has collected over 4 million records. The program's surveillance activities have contributed substantially to evidence-based decision-making to reduce injuries, support research, and establish preventive safeguards to protect the health and safety of Canadians. Patients presenting at participating hospitals are asked to complete a data collection form capturing the causes and circumstances contributing to the injury or poisoning event. Using this text, hospital and program staff have traditionally coded numerous surveillance variable codes manually for subsequent analysis within e-CHIRPP, the program's purpose-built analytical application on the Canadian Network for Public Health Intelligence public health informatics platform. Manual coding of this complex data is administratively burdensome and results in a significant time lag in the availability of important surveillance findings. Objective: With the initial goal of achieving a preliminary stage of implementation, the objective was to establish the capability to achieve enhanced timeliness of surveillance findings within a process of adaptability and continuous improvement by applying machine learning to auto-code injury data based on patient narratives. Methods: The research, development, and implementation of machine learning and auto-coding within the e-CHIRPP system were led by the Canadian Network for Public Health Intelligence team in collaboration with the CHIRPP program team. Data were extracted from e-CHIRPP and prepared for training, and candidate algorithms well suited for classification and supervised learning were initially assessed. Subsequently, 1 algorithm was chosen for further assessment based on initial accuracy, prediction confidence, and training time. The chosen algorithm was then further assessed in 2 stages, again using e-CHIRPP extracts: first, for a 2-year data set and then again for a 7-year data set. The sources of inaccuracies were investigated with a view to informing the refinement of the overall process and establishing ongoing adaptability and continuous improvement. Results: Auto-coding of injury variables showed a high level of accuracy in most cases when compared to variables previously coded manually. Importantly, insights were also gained into the sources of observed inaccuracies and measures to foster ongoing refinement of the process. Conclusions: The application of machine learning and auto-coding shows strong potential to benefit surveillance activities across various public health disciplines, yielding near real-time availability of intelligence, reduced administrative workload, continuous improvement, and adaptability to database growth and change.

Indexed as

auto-codinginformaticsinjurymachine learningpoisoningpublic healthsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41406461
PMCPMC12711162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.