Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41406387›Full record

ReviewSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026

Toward Sustainable Lithium-Ion Batteries: Recycling and Reuse Strategies for Spent Graphite Anodes.

Zhifei Mao, Jingshan Chai, Ruigang Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhifei MaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Jingshan ChaiDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Ruigang WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0678-7460

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation 2400108U.S. National Science Foundation 2427215U.S. National Science Foundation 2427263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing demand for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) has intensified the need for sustainable graphite recycling and reuse. Spent graphite anodes, accounting for a significant portion of battery waste, suffer from structural degradation, surface contamination, and the formation of complex impurities, posing challenges for direct reuse. This review introduces the general degradation origins of spent graphite anodes and focuses on recycling, regeneration, and modification strategies, including hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical approaches. The emerging technique of Flash Joule heating (FJH) is also discussed. Regenerated graphite generally fails to meet the desired electrochemical performance and therefore needs further modification. Strategies including surface engineering, structural regulation, and hybridization with other materials have been widely explored, leading to improved structural stability, fast-charging capability, and even higher energy density. Finally, the key challenges hindering large-scale application are identified. This review aims to provide comprehensive insights into sustainable graphite recycling and reuse, promoting the development of high-performance and environmentally responsible LIBs.

Indexed as

graphite anodehydrometallurgyLithium‐ion batteriespyrometallurgyrecycling and reuse

Identifiers

PMID41406387
PMCPMC12837362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.