Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41406148›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2025

'Thriving with bipolar disorder': The co-design of a peer-delivered group psychoeducation program and single-arm pilot feasibility evaluation protocol.

Emma Morton, Andrew Kcomt, Erin E Michalak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06878937 ('Thriving With Bipolar Disorder'), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06878937 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

'Thriving With Bipolar Disorder': Co-design and Pilot Evaluation of a Peer-Delivered, Quality of Life Focused Group Psychoeducation Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled44ConditionsBipolar Disorder (BD), Quality of Life (QOL)ArmsPeer Delivered Psychoeducation Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma MortonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew KcomtHope + Me: Mood Disorders Association of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7410-1435
Erin E MichalakDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0812-6527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-management strategies can be used by individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) to cope with symptoms and improve quality of life (QoL). Peer-facilitated psychoeducation has potential to diversify delivery of self-management information by capitalising on the expertise of individuals who live well with BD. This protocol describes the process of co-designing a novel peer-facilitated, QoL-focused, group psychoeducation program for people living with BD, and plans for its pilot evaluation.

methodsContent from two web-based, self-directed psychoeducational interventions was adapted to inform a peer-facilitated group program, using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework. The resultant program contains eight weekly two-hour sessions on topics related to QoL in BD, and contains a combination of education, opportunities for peer-to-peer knowledge exchange, and activities that facilitate practice of self-management strategies. A single-arm pilot evaluation of this program is planned: individuals who self-identify as living with BD (~n = 40) will be recruited from the community. Four groups (~n = 10) will be delivered online by peer facilitators. The primary outcome will be feasibility (session attendance). Data will also be collected on fidelity, intervention acceptability, and impacts (QoL, mood symptoms, self-stigma, subjective recovery, self-efficacy, self-compassion, social support). A subset of participants (~n = 12) and peer facilitators (~n = 4) will be invited to participate in a feedback interview post-intervention. DISCUSSION: Recovery-oriented healthcare frameworks emphasise a focus on patient-valued outcomes and the development on a peer workforce. By evaluating this novel intervention, we hope to lay the groundwork for peer-facilitated programs specific to the priorities of individuals with BD, that may be embedded in clinical settings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06878937.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderPatient Education as TopicPeer GroupAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID41406148
PMCPMC12711008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.