ArticlePlant physiology2026
Drought-induced delays in stem hydraulic development shape gas exchange and growth recovery in Douglas fir.
Article in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do trees starve to death? Insights into the roles of carbon reserves and stem photosynthesis in drought-induced sapling mortality.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Warming Alters Non-Structural Carbohydrate Dynamics and Source-Sink Regulation in Two Temperate Tree Species.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Focus issue editorial: ecophysiology.Plant physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The limiting factors of tree recovery from drought, particularly the coordination between carbon sources and sinks, remain poorly understood. In this study, juvenile Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) were exposed to 28 d of mild or severe drought, followed by 35 d of recovery. We continuously monitored CO₂ and H₂O fluxes in shoots and roots to derive gas exchange and carbon accumulation, while measuring basal area to estimate stem growth and sapwood development. To identify underlying mechanisms of drought recovery, we periodically measured nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC), midday water potential (Ψmd), and foliar abscisic acid (ABA). We found no evidence that ABA or Ψmd limited gas exchange recovery, with stomatal conductance recovery instead related to drought-induced reductions in sapwood development. While carbon accumulation ultimately recovered to control levels following mild stress, severe stress caused persistent impairments, ultimately reducing carbon accumulation by 51%, with stem growth similarly affected. We found no evidence of growth being limited by NSC, which remained abundant. However, we suggest that drought-induced limitations to stem development govern this pattern. This became clear when considering the diurnal growth cycle, where daytime growth was largely absent in trees after exposure to severe drought despite accounting for up to 30% of total growth in control trees. Daytime growth appeared to depend on sufficient sapwood area, which likely buffered xylem tension to support growth conditions. Our findings suggest drought-induced reductions of stem hydraulic development constrain the recovery of gas exchange and growth. Further, altered diurnal growth patterns may explain prolonged productivity declines in forests following drought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.