ArticleGenetics2026
Students as carbon accountants: calculating carbon costs of a PhD in neuroscience.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research is an energy- and resource-demanding activity. However, despite emerging sustainability initiatives, a paucity of data and uptake of green initiatives continue to hamper effective and accountable emissions mitigation. Worldwide, >250,000 doctoral students graduate annually across all academic disciplines. Empowering students to engage in carbon accounting can raise awareness of sustainability in research and provide a substantial and robust resource of carbon data alongside a powerful community-driven impetus for decarbonization. Here, we demonstrate how students and other researchers can consistently measure the carbon footprint of their work, using 1 PhD student's research in a Drosophila neuroscience lab as our case study. We present a life cycle assessment of the equivalent carbon dioxide emissions generated by the student's research activities. Moreover, we explain how students can create a "carbon appendix' to their research, as a common framework for disseminating carbon data and revealed strategies for improving research sustainability. We argue that the process of creating a carbon appendix can empower researchers to scrutinize sustainability practices, empower them to implement effective green initiatives, and identify data-driven solutions to meet and exceed funders' sustainability targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.