ArticlePloS one2025
Electrophysiological fingerprints of healthy cervical epithelial and HeLa cells: Membrane potential, zeta potential and passive electrical properties.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing appreciation that cellular electrical mechanisms play an important role both in cell regulation, and in cell dysregulation in diseases such as cancer. These electrical mechanisms are measured using several different methods, which yield characteristics including the membrane potential, capacitance and conductance, the extracellular (ζ) potential and cytoplasm conductivity. However, since these are measured using different techniques, the combination of all of these (the cancer electrome) has yet to be described. In this paper, we report on the difference between the electromes of cervical cancer cell line HeLa, with clinically-derived primary cervical epithelial cells. These were investigated using dielectrophoresis (DEP) and ζ-potential, with these data then being used to calculate the membrane potential Vm. Results indicate significant differences in membrane conductance and capacitance, membrane potential, ζ-potential and cytoplasm conductivity between the two cell types. Furthermore, treatment with the K+ blocker Tetraethylammonium caused distinct alterations in electrophysiology of the two lineages, pointing towards different roles for K+ in cancer and normal cells. This work presents a novel and cost-effective approach, combining five distinct electrical properties to form a "fingerprint" to characterize and discriminate healthy and malignant cells in a label-free, rapid manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.