ArticlePloS one2025
Effect of Ab interno XEN gel stent implantation on corneal astigmatism.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) after XEN gel stent implantation over 5 visits during a 3-month follow-up. Changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), IOP-lowering medications, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were also assessed.
methodsThis prospective cohort study recruited 24 eyes from 24 glaucoma patients at KKU Eye Center, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. All eyes underwent XEN implantation, using our specific surgical technique. We evaluated both the magnitude and the axis of SIA at 1, 2 weeks, 1, 2 and 3 months after the procedure. Preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), IOP-lowering medications, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were also analyzed.
resultsWe observed a statistically significant centroid SIA of 0.14 D. at an axis of 105° and median SIA of 0.36 D. at 1 week following XEN (p < 0.01). However, no further significant statistical change in SIA was found at 2 weeks, and 1, 2, and 3 months postoperatively. Additionally, there was no significant change in BCVA after XEN. Moreover, reductions in IOP and IOP-lowering medications were statistically significant.
conclusionsAb Interno XEN gel stent implantation induces a small SIA immediately after the surgery, but no further significant change during 3-month follow-up period. Although SIA has no significant effect on visual acuity, this should be addressed with patients preoperatively. Further studies are needed to investigate how different surgical techniques may affect refractive changes after XEN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.