Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41406091›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Targeting anger for COVID-19 prevention: The motivating role of anger on media use and vaccination intention.

Yoo Jung Oh, Muhammad Ehab Rasul, Jong In Lim, Christopher Calabrese, Emily McKinley, Hannah Stevens, Monique Mitchell Turner, Maria Knight Lapinski, Tai-Quan Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yoo Jung OhDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7829-8535
Muhammad Ehab RasulNational University of Singapore, Centre for Trusted Internet and Community, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5175-9023
Jong In LimDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Christopher CalabreseDepartment of Communication, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6216-0489
Emily McKinleyDepartment of Communication, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5262-9340
Hannah StevensDepartment of Communication, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Monique Mitchell TurnerDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Maria Knight LapinskiDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Tai-Quan PengDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in public anger due to its disruptive and harmful nature. However, anger remains an understudied concept despite its potential to persuade the public and spark action. The current study investigates the role of anger in driving COVID-19 vaccination intentions. In Study 1, through a rolling-cross sectional survey of U.S. adults during the early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic (N = 6,141), it was found that anger towards COVID-19 was associated with increased use of social and traditional media news, which was then related to improved vaccination intentions. In Study 2, utilizing computational analysis of a Twitter (now X) dataset using an AI classifier, 15 targets of anger were identified from real-world anger expressions in social media discourse about COVID-19. Building on these insights, Study 3 involved a representative survey of U.S. adults during the post-emergency declaration stage of COVID-19 (N = 1,005). This survey aimed to replicate the findings of Study 1 while incorporating the anger targets identified in Study 2. The results revealed that different targets of anger were associated with vaccination intentions through the consumption of traditional news media. Although social media was a prominent channel for news about vaccination at the beginning of the pandemic, our findings suggest that traditional media news use may be an important link in understanding the relationship between anger and vaccination intentions. Theoretical, practical, and methodological implications are discussed.

Indexed as

AngerCOVID-19MotivationVaccinationAdolescentAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMass MediaMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID41406091
PMCPMC12711046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.