ArticlePloS one2025
Metabolic profiles of captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Lao PDR and Thailand.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared metabolic health biomarkers, lipid profiles, body condition scores (BCS), and adrenocortical function of 78 captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) managed under contrasting systems in Laos and Thailand. In Laos, elephants are primarily managed in naturalistic forest environments with limited tourist interaction, while many Thai elephants participate in tourism activities like riding and are fed calorie-dense supplemental foods, with restricted access to natural forage. Serum and fecal samples were collected for 1 year to assess serum glucose, insulin, cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoproteins, fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (fGCM), and BCS across seasons, sexes, and management regimens. Thai elephants exhibited significantly higher glucose, insulin, lipid levels, and BCS, reflecting the effects of high-calorie diets and reduced exercise, while Lao elephants displayed healthier metabolic profiles and BCS, attributed to natural foraging and physical activity. In Thai elephants, BCS was positively correlated with insulin, and negatively correlated with the glucose-to-insulin ratio, total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL, suggesting overweight elephants in Thailand are at risk of metabolic derangements. None of those parameters were significantly correlated with BCS in the Laotian population. A surprising finding was higher fGCM in Lao elephants, which could have been related to new social opportunities and pandemic-driven management disruptions at the Elephant Conservation Center. These findings underscore how management practices, particularly diet composition, exercise opportunities, and degree of naturalistic living, can influence the health and welfare of captive elephants and support the adoption of more naturalistic management strategies to improve elephant welfare in captivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.