ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Women's experiences collecting and accessing water in Guatemala, Honduras, Kenya, and Zimbabwe: A mixed-methods investigation.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mixed-methods study to test and assess uptake for gender-specific WASH indicators in Bangladesh: study protocol.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Women's experiences collecting and accessing water in Guatemala, Honduras, Kenya, and Zimbabwe: A mixed-methods investigation.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1.8 billion people live in households that collect water from sources off household premises, creating burdens that disproportionately affect women. A current and comprehensive investigation of women's water collection experiences is needed to understand their burden of this labor. This study used mixed methods, including (a) go-along, in-depth interviews (IDIs), (b) semi-structured observation, (c) activity-tracking smart watches, and (d) scales, to (1) understand women's practices, perspectives, and experiences going to water sources; (2) determine actual water collection time, distance, caloric expenditure, total elevation ascended, weight carried, and water volume collected; and (3) assess alignment of women's estimated and actual water journey times. Ninety-four women participated across four countries: Guatemala (n = 22), Honduras (n = 17), Kenya (n = 22), Zimbabwe (n = 33). Women reported accessing various sources depending on season and needs, faced risks due to terrain and animals, and experienced physical injury and mental burden. Experiences varied within and by country. The mean water journey time (including going to the source, activities at the source, and returning) was 82 minutes (range across entire sample: 13 minutes (Guatemala) - 287 minutes (Kenya)). The mean distance traveled was 3.5km (range: 0.2km (Guatemala, Honduras, Zimbabwe) - 15.8km (Kenya)). Mean caloric expenditure was 231kcal (range: 36 (Guatemala) - 952 (Zimbabwe)). The mean volume of water collected was 16.1L. (range: 3.7L (Kenya) - 38.2L (Zimbabwe). Women also carried children, wet laundry, and other items resulting in heavy loads. The mean total weight of loads brought from water sources was 19.3 kg (range: 5.0 kg (Honduras) - 50.1 kg (Zimbabwe). Findings demonstrate how a lack of adequate and accessible water drains women of energy and time and poses risks to their well-being. Our findings reinforce the need to redouble efforts to improve water access in low-resource settings and rigorously measure the impacts of such efforts on women's lives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.