Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41406031›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2026

Optimizing hepatitis C virus testing in the era of point-of-care RNA diagnostics.

Emily W Helm, H Nina Kim, Alexander L Greninger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily W HelmDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
H Nina KimDivision of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alexander L GreningerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7443-0527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major advances in hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment have made timely and accurate diagnosis a critical determinant for United States elimination goals. Recently authorized point-of-care (POC) HCV RNA testing enables faster diagnosis than the traditional two-step algorithm but comes with higher laboratory costs. We analyzed HCV testing data from 2017 to 2024 across three medical centers in Seattle, Washington, to evaluate strategies for integrating new rapid direct detection tests. HCV antibody testing volumes increased 72% over the study period, with outpatient settings accounting for 76.0% of tests and a 2.7% positivity rate. Emergency department testing increased by 682% to 5,654 tests in 2024, with a 10.3% positivity rate, such that one-third of all HCV diagnoses in our medical system now originate from the public county hospital emergency department. Adoption of sample-to-answer HCV RNA testing in 2024 reduced median collection-to-result turnaround times for antibody-positive specimens from 84 h (IQR 58-120) to 45 h (IQR 28-57). Using a viral load cut-off of 10,000 IU/mL, HCV antigen testing was estimated to detect 98% of infections. Converting all HCV testing to POC RNA would increase laboratory costs by 260% (+$6,439 per HCV infection detected), while restricting POC RNA to the public county hospital emergency department would increase costs by 22.3% (+$552 per HCV infection detected). Reflexing antibody-positive samples to antigen testing slightly reduced costs. These findings highlight the significant laboratory costs associated with POC HCV RNA testing and the need for specific reimbursement and funding mechanisms for new HCV testing algorithms.IMPORTANCEHepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination in the United States requires rapid and reliable diagnosis, yet current testing pathways are too slow for treatment initiation in a single clinical visit. Analysis of more than 325,000 HCV test results from 2017 to 2024 from our academic medical system in Seattle, Washington, highlights the growing role of emergency departments, particularly those serving safety-net populations, in making new HCV diagnoses. While point-of-care HCV RNA testing can enable connection to treatment, it substantially increases laboratory costs when implemented broadly. Targeted use of point-of-care HCV RNA in high-yield settings such as safety-net emergency departments is essential to maximize public health impact while preserving laboratory resources. These findings highlight the need for policy and reimbursement frameworks that support cost-effective deployment of new HCV diagnostic technologies.

Indexed as

HepacivirusHepatitis CPoint-of-Care TestingRNA, ViralEmergency Service, HospitalHepatitis C AntibodiesHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesViral LoadWashingtonHepatitis C AntibodiesRNA, ViralantibodyantigenHCVpoint-of-carereimbursementRNA

Identifiers

PMID41406031
PMCPMC12802147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.