ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2026
HIV serologic reactivity varies with time of ART initiation in persons on long-term ART.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Different approaches to HIV confirmation: a survey of three Italian regions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV serologic responses measured by clinical screening assays may be blunted when antiretroviral treatment (ART) suppresses HIV replication from the initial infection stages, with further decay following long-term treatment. Sensitivity may vary according to the timing of ART initiation after HIV acquisition, antigens (Ags) utilized to detect anti-HIV antibodies (Abs), and HIV subtype. We obtained samples from long-term ART-suppressed persons with HIV (PWH) who started ART at acute/early or during chronic infection, from blood donors with undetectable HIV RNA and nonreactive serology, and from blood donors with positive RNA and reactive serology (presumably untreated infections) spanning multiple HIV subtypes to compare patterns of serologic reactivity using two Ag/Ab screening assays (Alinity and VITROS). We found that earlier ART initiation was associated with progressively lower signal-to-cutoff ratios (S/CO) in both assays. Serologic reactivity in clinical samples from participants initiating ART at Fiebig 2 was somewhat lower for CRF01_AE (67%) than other HIV subtypes (91%) on the Alinity platform. In the late-ART initiation group, reactivity was high for both assays despite long-term treatment, with higher S/CO values in samples from blood donors with presumably untreated infection. We observed no strong evidence of S/CO waning >96 weeks after ART initiation in the early-ART initiation group. Our findings suggest potential limitations for HIV infection ascertainment in clinical samples from long-term treated PWH who started ART at early infection stages using currently approved serologic tests.IMPORTANCEThis manuscript increases our understanding of how the timing of initiation of HIV treatment affects our ability to detect the infection using commercial blood tests that measure HIV antigens or antibodies. Being able to detect HIV is important for clinical diagnostics and blood screening, and HIV is not as easily detected in persons who begin therapy shortly after infection using serological tests. In contrast to prior work, we show that current clinical HIV tests have stable reactivity over time in persons on long-term HIV treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.