Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405971›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2026

Harnessing controlled human infection models to accelerate vaccine development for neglected tropical diseases: Lessons from leishmaniasis.

Vivak Parkash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vivak ParkashDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9701-5767

Funding

EDCTP RIA2016V-1640Medical Research Council MR/R014973/1National Institute for Health and Care ResearchWellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT108518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControlled Human Infection Models (CHIMs) offer a powerful approach to expedite vaccine development by enabling early evaluation of vaccine candidate efficacy and immune responses. Their role is increasingly relevant for neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), where traditional trial approaches may be slow, costly, or unfeasible. This review explores the scientific, ethical and translational dimensions of CHIMs, with a focus on the recently developed Leishmania major CHIM for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL).

methodsA narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed literature and regulatory guidance documents published over the past two decades was conducted, with additional insights drawn from original fieldwork and the first-in-human sand fly-transmitted CHIM for CL. Considerations included CHIM design principles, immunological outcomes, safety considerations and translational utility, including integration with omics and early phase trials.

resultsCHIMs provide early efficacy data, help identify immune correlates of protection and facilitate the prioritisation of vaccine candidates. The Leishmania major CHIM demonstrated safety, high participant acceptability and revealed insights into lesion kinetics and host-parasite interactions. Ethical and regulatory frameworks remain heterogeneous across regions, limiting scalability. Barriers to CHIM deployment in low- and middle-income countries include infrastructure, governance and community engagement challenges.

conclusionsCHIMs represent a critical translational tool for NTD vaccine research. Lessons from the CL CHIM underscore the potential and challenges of broader implementation. Harmonised regulation, ethical innovation and global collaboration will be essential for future impact.

Indexed as

Leishmania majorLeishmaniasis, CutaneousLeishmaniasis VaccinesNeglected DiseasesVaccine DevelopmentAnimalsHumansLeishmaniasis Vaccinescontrolled human infectionhuman challenge studiesLeishmanianeglected tropical diseases

Identifiers

PMID41405971
PMCPMC12827841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.