ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2026
Harnessing controlled human infection models to accelerate vaccine development for neglected tropical diseases: Lessons from leishmaniasis.
Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a commercial real-time PCR assay targeting Leishmania spp. with microscopically positive skin biopsies obtained from Nigerian patients.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2026Article
- Harnessing controlled human infection models to accelerate vaccine development for neglected tropical diseases: Lessons from leishmaniasis.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundControlled Human Infection Models (CHIMs) offer a powerful approach to expedite vaccine development by enabling early evaluation of vaccine candidate efficacy and immune responses. Their role is increasingly relevant for neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), where traditional trial approaches may be slow, costly, or unfeasible. This review explores the scientific, ethical and translational dimensions of CHIMs, with a focus on the recently developed Leishmania major CHIM for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL).
methodsA narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed literature and regulatory guidance documents published over the past two decades was conducted, with additional insights drawn from original fieldwork and the first-in-human sand fly-transmitted CHIM for CL. Considerations included CHIM design principles, immunological outcomes, safety considerations and translational utility, including integration with omics and early phase trials.
resultsCHIMs provide early efficacy data, help identify immune correlates of protection and facilitate the prioritisation of vaccine candidates. The Leishmania major CHIM demonstrated safety, high participant acceptability and revealed insights into lesion kinetics and host-parasite interactions. Ethical and regulatory frameworks remain heterogeneous across regions, limiting scalability. Barriers to CHIM deployment in low- and middle-income countries include infrastructure, governance and community engagement challenges.
conclusionsCHIMs represent a critical translational tool for NTD vaccine research. Lessons from the CL CHIM underscore the potential and challenges of broader implementation. Harmonised regulation, ethical innovation and global collaboration will be essential for future impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.