Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405935›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2026

Bowel Urgency Improvement Correlates With Clinical, Biochemical, and Intestinal Ultrasound Improvements in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cross Sectional Multicenter Study.

Ferdinando D'Amico, Olga Maria Nardone, Alessandro Bruno, Mariangela Allocca, Alessandra Zilli, Federica Furfaro, Tommaso Lorenzo Parigi, Virginia Solitano, Federica Ungaro, Ilaria Faggiani and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ferdinando D'AmicoGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Olga Maria NardoneDepartment of Public Health, Gastroenterology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9554-4785
Alessandro BrunoGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6721-2234
Mariangela AlloccaGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra ZilliGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Federica FurfaroGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-7295
Tommaso Lorenzo ParigiGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Virginia SolitanoGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-6778
Federica UngaroExperimental Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Disease, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-7795
Ilaria FaggianiGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4501-6700
Alessia La MantiaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0017-2576
Giulio CalabreseDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0802-3173
Gionata FiorinoIBD Unit, Department of Gastroenterology & Digestive Endoscopy, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5623-2968
Vipul JairathDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-0033
Laurent Peyrin-BirouletDepartment of Gastroenterology, CHRU Nancy, INSERM NGERE, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2536-6618
Luca MassiminoExperimental Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Disease, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3975-9148
Fabiana CastiglioneExperimental Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Disease, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Silvio DaneseGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBowel urgency (BU) is reported by over 80% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 60% of those with Crohn's disease (CD). However, the impact of advanced therapies on BU has not been consistently evaluated.

objectivesTo assess the effect of advanced therapies on BU improvement in patients with UC and CD.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients with confirmed UC or CD who started an advanced therapy with available data regarding BU before and after induction therapy between 2023 and 2024 at two tertiary centers. BU was assessed using the numeric-rating-scale urgency score (NRS-us), with BU defined as NRS-us ≥ 3. The primary endpoint was BU improvement (NRS-us ≤ 3 or reduction of at least two points) after the induction phase. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with BU improvement.

resultsA total of 159 patients were included (56% male; 65% UC; median age: 36 years (Interquartile range [IQR] 27-25)). TNFα inhibitors were the most frequently used agents (49.6%). At baseline, the median NRS-us was 7. After induction, 50.9% of patients achieved BU improvement, with a mean reduction of 2.3 ± 2.9 points. BU improvement was significantly associated with clinical remission (false-discovery-rate [FDR] = 0.009 in CD and FDR = 0.010 in UC), normalization of fecal calprotectin (FDR = 0.001), CRP (FDR = 0.008), and bowel wall thickness on intestinal ultrasound (FDR = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between therapeutic classes.

conclusionBU improved in approximately half of IBD patients following induction with advanced therapies. Its improvement correlated with clinical, biochemical, and ultrasound remission, supporting the incorporation of BU assessment into routine clinical monitoring.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntestinesLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsUltrasonographyLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitorsadvanced therapiesbowel urgencyCrohn's diseaseinflammatory bowel diseaseulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID41405935
PMCPMC12781194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.