ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Mapping the landscape of predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This large-scale bibliometric analysis maps the global research landscape of predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) from 2011 to 2025. Leveraging 9,075 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection, we used co-citation, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence analyses to quantify publication dynamics, collaborative networks, and conceptual evolution. China produced the most publications (1,923, a country-level count reflecting multi-national co-authorship), while the United States led in influence as reflected by high-impact institutions (e.g., MD Anderson Cancer Center) and prolific authors (e.g., Kurzrock R, H-index 116). The strongest international collaboration was between the USA and China (276 co-authored publications). Thematic evolution revealed a paradigm shift from reliance on single biomarkers (e.g., PD-L1, tumor mutational burden [TMB]) toward integrated multi-omics signatures that incorporate tumor microenvironment features and advanced computational approaches. Keyword analysis highlighted artificial intelligence (n = 640), radiomics, and liquid biopsy as emerging frontiers. Notably, gastroesophageal junction cancers exhibited the strongest citation burst (strength = 11.53), highlighting unresolved tumor-specific controversies such as the predictive validity of PD-L1 in this setting. However, significant translational barriers remain: lack of biomarker assay standardization, high analytical variability (e.g., differing PD-L1 immunohistochemistry clones and inconsistent TMB cutoff thresholds), and insufficient clinical validation. This study provides an evidence-based overview to guide future research toward multi-omics integration, prospective validation, and cross-disciplinary collaboration, thereby advancing precision immuno-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.