ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2025
Relevance of balneotherapy for osteoarthritis-a systematic literature review covering the past 5 years.
Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this systematic review was to focus on the more recent scientific literature describing the effects of balneotherapy on osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized (RCT) or quasi-randomized (QRCT) articles including balneotherapy as an intervention for osteoarthritis were included. The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Directory of Open Access Journals databases were screened between January 2019 and August 2025. The effects on the parameters pain and function were summarized.
resultsIn total, 1124 relevant articles were identified, 13 of which were fulfilled in inclusion criteria. The PEDro scale score ranged from 5 to 10 points, showing that the articles were of fair to excellent methodological quality. The studies were heterogeneous in terms of treatment protocols and outcome parameters; therefore, pooling of data for meta-analysis was not possible. There were five RCTs (one of which was quasi-randomized) concerning medicinal water (including peat suspensions, etc.). In one of these studies, the authors additionally used mud pack applications for treatment in another intervention group. Regarding packs (peloids, mud, hot packs), five RCTs were included, one of which was a QRCT. One RCT and one QRCT used hydrotherapy (with tap water) as an intervention. Additionally, in one RCT, geotherapy ("Dolomite powder") was used as a treatment. In summary, the included studies demonstrated that balneotherapy might improve pain as well as physical function.
conclusionThe present scientific data demonstrate that balneotherapy results in a reduction of pain and an amelioration of "functional limitations" in patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis. Balneotherapy appears to be clinically relevant as part of state-of-the-art treatment concepts in these individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41405806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.