ArticleGeroScience2026
Adults up to 80 years old maintain effective movement planning when facing complex body dynamics.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparing arm to whole-body motor control disambiguates age-related deterioration from compensation.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aging significantly impacts motor performance, especially in multi-joint movement tasks where the nervous system needs to adequately coordinate mechanical interactions between joints. Effective coordination of multiple joints relies on intact feedforward control to predict movement dynamics in the initial phase of the movement, and on feedback control to fine-tune the execution in the final phase. The effect of aging on these specific control mechanisms remains controversial. Here, we investigated a pure-elbow motion task with a group of 50 young (20-35 years old), 80 old (55-70 years old) and 30 older-old (80 + years old) healthy participants. They performed 30° elbow flexions and extensions under two speed conditions as higher elbow velocities increase interaction torques at the shoulder, and demand greater neuromuscular effort for stabilization. The timing and magnitude of anticipatory EMG activity of the agonist shoulder muscle, necessary to counteract interaction torques, were similar across all age groups. Moreover, increasing elbow velocity did not result in any performance differences between young and older adults, indicating that shoulder stabilization during movement initiation remained intact with age. However, older adults exhibited reduced ability to stabilize the shoulder position until the end of the movement, leading to decreased accuracy with older age. These results suggest that feedforward control, which is essential for shoulder stabilization during movement initiation, is functionally stable during healthy aging and remains resilient to increased motor demands. In contrast, feedback control appears to deteriorate with age, potentially contributing to reduced movement precision in the final phase of the multi-joint movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.