ArticleCarbon balance and management2025
Spatiotemporal evolution of carbon sequestration and the impact of key drivers under multiple SSP-RCP scenarios in the Yangtze River economic belt.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disentangling exogenous and endogenous memory in global vegetation productivity: dominant role and future strengthening of vegetation carryover effects.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carbon sequestration (CS), a key component of climate change mitigation and carbon neutrality efforts, is strongly influenced by land use/land cover change (LUCC). However, the spatiotemporal evolution of CS in response to future LUCC trajectories under urbanization remains underexplored. Therefore, this study focuses on the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB), a region characterized by rapid urbanization and high carbon emissions, and develops an integrated SD-PLUS-InVEST modelling framework to evaluate the impacts of LUCC under three SSP-RCP scenarios on regional CS dynamics. Results show that, cropland is projected to decline by 5%, 10%, and 3%, while forestland increases by 8%, 3%, and 5% under SSP1-2.6, SSP5-8.5, and SSP2-4.5, respectively. Correspondingly, CS shows a 12% increase under SSP1-2.6, an 8% decrease under SSP5-8.5, and a moderate enhancement under SSP2-4.5. The XGBoost-SHAP analysis quantified the impacts of key drivers, revealing that elevated temperature and population growth are strongly correlated with declines in CS, while economic growth is positively correlated with enhanced CS capacity. This research provides valuable insights into how LUCC affects CS under varying development scenarios, offering actionable guidance for formulating regional land-use policies that promote CS and contribute to climate mitigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.