Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405780›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

High-throughput multiplex qPCR for distinguishing Salmonella serovars Heidelberg, Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Gallinarum, and Pullorum.

Evelyn Cristine da Silva, Caio de Oliveira Lima, Emanoelli Aparecida Rodrigues Dos Santos, Leonardo Ereno Tadielo, Karina Pires Gutierrez, Rafael Alves Santomauro, Wanderson Sirley Reis Teixeira, Juliano Gonçalves Pereira, João Pessoa Araújo Junior, Fábio Sossai Possebon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evelyn Cristine da SilvaInstitute for Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tecomarias Avenue, Botucatu, 18607-440, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0722-7710
Caio de Oliveira LimaDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Prof. Walter Maurício Correa st, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
Emanoelli Aparecida Rodrigues Dos SantosInstitute for Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tecomarias Avenue, Botucatu, 18607-440, SP, Brazil.
Leonardo Ereno TadieloFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Rua dos Funcionários, 1540, Cabral, Curitiba, 80035-050, PR, Brazil.
Karina Pires GutierrezInstitute for Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tecomarias Avenue, Botucatu, 18607-440, SP, Brazil.
Rafael Alves SantomauroDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Prof. Walter Maurício Correa st, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
Wanderson Sirley Reis TeixeiraDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Prof. Walter Maurício Correa st, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
Juliano Gonçalves PereiraDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Prof. Walter Maurício Correa st, Botucatu, 18618-681, SP, Brazil.
João Pessoa Araújo JuniorInstitute for Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tecomarias Avenue, Botucatu, 18607-440, SP, Brazil.
Fábio Sossai PossebonInstitute for Biotechnology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Tecomarias Avenue, Botucatu, 18607-440, SP, Brazil. fabio.possebon@unesp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazilian regulation under the National Salmonella Control Program mandates surveillance of serovars Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Gallinarum, and Pullorum in commercial broiler chicken and turkey farms. However, the recent emergence of Salmonella Heidelberg in poultry products highlights a new concern regarding the spread of additional serovars. In this context, the present study aims to standardize a multiplex qPCR assay capable of simultaneously differentiating the four regulated serovars and S. Heidelberg, optimizing sensitivity and analysis speed to effectively address current sanitary challenges in poultry production. Salmonella isolates were obtained from the microbiological collections of the Serviço de Orientação à Alimentação Pública (SOAP), the Serviço de Ornitopatologia FMVZ/UNESP, and from SOAP’s routine laboratory. Bacterial genomic DNA was purified using an internal protocol based on magnetic beads, and genus-level detection of Salmonella was performed by real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting a conserved region of the invA gene. For the multiplex assay, primers and probes specific to each regulated serovar were employed according to previous standardizations, while the probe specific for S. Heidelberg was designed in silico and experimentally validated within this study. The multiplex qPCR reaction was optimized using five combinations of primer concentrations (0.05–0.30 µM) and probe concentrations (0.05–0.15 µM). The limit of detection was established from serial dilutions of genomic DNA, and the assay was validated on 21 typified S. Heidelberg strains, followed by evaluation on 41 Salmonella isolates from naturally contaminated samples. All tested conditions yielded consistent amplification of S. Heidelberg isolates, and the mix containing primers at 0.10 µM and probe at 0.05 µM was selected as the most robust. The limit of detection (LOD) was defined to a maximum Cq value of 33.39. When evaluating 21 typified S. Heidelberg strains using the standardized multiplex assay, Cq values ranged from 16.03 to 27.06 (mean = 18.55; median = 17.36; standard deviation = 2.79). In a set of 41 isolates from naturally contaminated samples, four exhibited amplification for the S. Heidelberg target, with Cq values of 18.04, 17.60, 16.00, and 16.61. The standardized multiplex qPCR assay consistently detected S. Heidelberg and regulated serovars. This rapid, robust, and adaptable diagnostic meets the poultry industry’s need for accurate, timely detection, enabling early surveillance of emerging serovars like S. Heidelberg and supporting active monitoring and risk mitigation.

Indexed as

Multiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPoultry DiseasesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnimalsBrazilChickensDNA, BacterialSensitivity and SpecificitySerogroupTurkeysDNA, BacterialFood safety surveillanceMultiplex qPCRPoultry production monitoringSalmonella HeidelbergSerovar differentiation

Identifiers

PMID41405780
PMCPMC12712246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.