Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405728›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2025

Effect of the combination of long-pulse 1064 nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser and picosecond 755 nm alexandrite laser with diffractive lens array on skin photoaging: a randomized, split-face multicenter clinical trial.

Xianglei Wu, Lifang Guo, Xiaojin Wu, Xing Liu, Pingping Cai, Hualing Shi, Xue Wang, Ying Shang, Xiaoxi Lin, Yiping Ge and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xianglei WuDepartment of Laser and Aesthetic medicine, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Lifang GuoDepartment of Cosmetic Laser Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Dermatology Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xiaojin WuDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xing LiuDepartment of Cosmetic Laser Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Dermatology Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Pingping CaiDepartment of Cosmetic Laser Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Dermatology Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Hualing ShiDepartment of Cosmetic Laser Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Dermatology Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xue WangDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ying ShangDepartment of Laser and Aesthetic medicine, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoxi LinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yiping GeDepartment of Cosmetic Laser Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Dermatology Hospital, Nanjing, China. gypfeng@hotmail.com.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. zz6503@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of the long-pulse 1064 nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (LP1064 nm) laser and picosecond 755 nm alexandrite (P755 nm) laser with a diffractive lens array (DLA) in improving skin photoaging. This prospective, randomized, split-face trial was conducted between April 2024 and February 2025 at two centers. A total of 22 healthy volunteers with facial photoaging symptoms aged 30-65 years were enrolled. The full face was treated with the LP1064 nm laser, and one side was treated with the P755 nm laser with DLA for three sessions at 1-month intervals. Efficacy and safety were assessed before each treatment and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. The primary outcome was the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) score. A total of 21 patients completed the study. The combined treatment side demonstrated further improvement in GAIS scores compared with the monotherapy side at 3 (85.7% vs. 66.7%) and 6 months (66.7% vs. 57.1%). Significant changes in the facial regions were observed. Volumetric analysis using 3D assessment revealed that the combined treatment had a more pronounced effect on the nasolabial folds and suborbital areas. VISIA analysis found significantly improved pigmentation and pore size at 1 and 3 months after treatment. No adverse events were observed on either side during or after treatment period. The combination of the LP1064 nm and P755 nm lasers with DLA can enhance skin rejuvenation by addressing the structural and pigmentary aspects of photoaging. These preliminary findings support the safety and efficacy of this combination approach. Further studies are needed to optimize this approach.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLow-Level Light TherapySkin AgingAdultAgedFaceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDiffractive lens arrayLong-pulse 1064 nm laserPhotoagingPicosecond laserRejuvenation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.