Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405689›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

A deep learning framework to stratify Nottingham histologic grade 2 breast tumors based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Roham Hadidchi, Anchita Agrawal, Michael Z Liu, Takouhie Maldijan, Yihui Zhu, Hien Quang Nguyen, Jinyu Lu, Della Makower, Susan Fineberg, Tim Q Duong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roham HadidchiDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Anchita AgrawalDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Michael Z LiuDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Takouhie MaldijanDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Yihui ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Hien Quang NguyenDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jinyu LuDepartment of Oncology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Della MakowerDepartment of Oncology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Susan FinebergDepartment of Pathology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Tim Q DuongDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. tim.duong@einsteinmed.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-2827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Nottingham Histologic Grade (NHG) informs prognosis and treatment decisions in breast cancer, but NHG2 tumors are biologically heterogeneous, leading to both under- and over-treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsClinical and imaging data from the Duke-Breast-Cancer-MRI (n = 877) and advanced-MRI-breast-lesions (n = 37) datasets were used to develop DeepRadGrade (DRG), a convolutional neural network model trained to differentiate NHG1 from NHG3 tumors on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. The model then classified 456 NHG2 tumors into DRG2- (NHG1-like) and DRG2+ (NHG3-like) subgroups. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox models adjusting for age, lymph node invasion, tumor stage, and molecular subtype.

resultsDRG achieved an AUC of 0.84 [95% CI: 0.83-0.86] in training, 0.82 [0.71-0.91] in testing, and 0.84 [0.69-0.96] in external validation. Among NHG2 tumors, 315 were classified as DRG2- and 131 as DRG2+. Patients with DRG2+ tumors had significantly worse RFS compared to DRG2- (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.39 [95% CI: 1.29-4.45], p = 0.0059), independent of standard prognostic factors. Incorporating DRG classification improved the Cox model's C-index from 0.68 to 0.73 (p = 0.040).

conclusionsA deep learning model applied to routine DCE MRI effectively stratified NHG2 breast tumors into clinically meaningful subgroups with distinct recurrence risk. This approach offers a cost-effective tool for individualized risk stratification and could help tailor treatment to minimize over- and under-treatment in intermediate-grade breast cancer. KEY POINTS: Question Difficulty in deciding between treatment options (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery) in patients with intermediate risk breast cancer (Nottingham Grade 2). Findings Deep learning model reclassified grade 2 tumors into grade 1- and 3-like based on MRI. Patients with grade 3-like tumors had worse RFS: adjusted hazard ratio = 2.39 [95% CI: 1.29-4.45], p = 0.0059). Clinical relevance Risk stratification could inform treatment choice to minimize over- and under-treatment in patients with intermediate-risk breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisContrast MediaBreast neoplasmsDynamic contrast-enhancedMagnetic resonance imagingNottingham histologic gradeRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41405689
PMCPMC13086883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.