ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
DOT-MGA for rapid determination of susceptibility to the combination of Ceftazidime-avibactam and Aztreonam among Enterobacterales.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid MALDI-TOF MS antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the MBT FAST assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical management of severe infections caused by Enterobacterales co-producing KPC and metallo-beta-lactamases is challenging. In these situations, the use of aztreonam-avibactam (AZA), or the association of aztreonam (ATM) with ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), in scenarios where AZA is not available, has demonstrated clinical efficacy. However, the time to obtain results of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test may be a concern. We aimed to evaluate DOT-MGA (Direct-on-target microdroplet growth assay) as a tool for the rapid determination of susceptibility to AZA, as well as CZA plus ATM, to improve patient’s outcome and reinforce antimicrobial stewardship policies. A total of 161 Enterobacterales, harboring or not (n = 8) a variety of resistance genes (54 blaKPC, 70 blaNDM, 26 blaKPC + blaNDM, 2 blaNDM + blaOXA−48−like, and 1 blaOXA−48−like), were evaluated for 4 different antibiotics/combination (CZA, ATM, ATM-CZA and AZA). According to broth microdilution (BMD), 61.5% isolates were resistant to CZA and 64.6% to ATM. All isolates were susceptible to ATM-CZA and AZA. DOT-MGA presented categorical agreement of 99.2% for CZA, ATM and ATM-CZA, and 98.4% for AZA compared to BMD. Only 2 VME and 3 ME were observed. DOT-MGA demonstrated excellent performance, with a considerably reduced turnaround time to results (approximately 4 h, instead of 16–20 h of the gold standard broth microdilution), demonstrating a potential to improve treatment of patients with infections caused by MDR bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.