Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405647›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

DOT-MGA for rapid determination of susceptibility to the combination of Ceftazidime-avibactam and Aztreonam among Enterobacterales.

Natália Kehl Moreira, Gabriela da Silva Collar, Julia Becker, Mariana Preussler Mott, Patricia Orlandi Barth, Clara Gubert Rodrigues, Afonso Luís Barth, Juliana Caireão

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natália Kehl MoreiraLaboratório de Pesquisa em Bacteriologia Clínica (LaBaC), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil. natkehl@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-6482
Gabriela da Silva CollarLaboratório de Pesquisa em Bacteriologia Clínica (LaBaC), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2819-0769
Julia BeckerLaboratório de Pesquisa em Bacteriologia Clínica (LaBaC), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.
Mariana Preussler MottServiço de Diagnóstico Laboratorial, Unidade de Microbiologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5130-9057
Patricia Orlandi BarthLaboratório de Pesquisa em Resistência Bacteriana (LABRESIS), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0763-1430
Clara Gubert RodriguesLaboratório Central de Análises Clínicas, Grupo Hospitalar Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brasil.
Afonso Luís BarthLaboratório de Pesquisa em Resistência Bacteriana (LABRESIS), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7969-3908
Juliana CaireãoLaboratório de Pesquisa em Bacteriologia Clínica (LaBaC), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8776-8447

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico INCT/MCT/CNPq/CAPES/FAPs n.197 - 16/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical management of severe infections caused by Enterobacterales co-producing KPC and metallo-beta-lactamases is challenging. In these situations, the use of aztreonam-avibactam (AZA), or the association of aztreonam (ATM) with ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), in scenarios where AZA is not available, has demonstrated clinical efficacy. However, the time to obtain results of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility test may be a concern. We aimed to evaluate DOT-MGA (Direct-on-target microdroplet growth assay) as a tool for the rapid determination of susceptibility to AZA, as well as CZA plus ATM, to improve patient’s outcome and reinforce antimicrobial stewardship policies. A total of 161 Enterobacterales, harboring or not (n = 8) a variety of resistance genes (54 blaKPC, 70 blaNDM, 26 blaKPC + blaNDM, 2 blaNDM + blaOXA−48−like, and 1 blaOXA−48−like), were evaluated for 4 different antibiotics/combination (CZA, ATM, ATM-CZA and AZA). According to broth microdilution (BMD), 61.5% isolates were resistant to CZA and 64.6% to ATM. All isolates were susceptible to ATM-CZA and AZA. DOT-MGA presented categorical agreement of 99.2% for CZA, ATM and ATM-CZA, and 98.4% for AZA compared to BMD. Only 2 VME and 3 ME were observed. DOT-MGA demonstrated excellent performance, with a considerably reduced turnaround time to results (approximately 4 h, instead of 16–20 h of the gold standard broth microdilution), demonstrating a potential to improve treatment of patients with infections caused by MDR bacteria.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsAztreonamCeftazidimeEnterobacteriaceaebeta-LactamasesDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo CompoundsAztreonambeta-LactamasesCeftazidimeDrug CombinationsAztreonam-avibactamCeftazidime-avibactamMALDI-TOFRapid diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID41405647
PMCPMC12712247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.