ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Functional cervical dystonia: diagnostic accuracy of distinct clinical features.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tardive cervical dystonia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Personality Disorders in Functional and Idiopathic Dystonia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional dystonia (FD) is one of the most common presentations among patients with functional movement disorders (FMDs). However, FD affecting neck muscles has not been well studied, even though cervical dystonia (CD) is one of the most common movement disorders.
methodsWe aimed to assess the clinical features and correlations of functional CD. Additionally, we compared the clinical features with 120 consecutive patients with non-functional CD and determined the diagnostic accuracy of contrasting variables.
resultsWe studied 72 consecutive patients with FD (n = 57, 79.2% were females), of whom 34 (47.2%) were identified with functional CD. The latter group had greater severity of FMDs determined by the Simplified Functional Movement Disorders Rating Scale (S-FMDRS) and a more common functional speech disorder compared with patients with FD without CD (P ≤ 0.001, for both variables). Compared to patients with non-functional CD, those with functional CD were younger, had more common retrocollis, anterior head shift, greater severity of dystonic postures, more frequent changing pattern of dystonia, more common dystonia in other body parts, lack of typical alleviating maneuvers (AM) and less frequent neck pain (P < 0.05, for all comparisons). Lack of AM had the highest sensitivity (0.97) and change in dystonia pattern had the highest specificity for the diagnosis of functional CD (0.98).
conclusionsFunctional CD represented 47.2% of patients with FD. Greater severity of FMDs and comorbid functional speech disorders were more common in patients with functional CD. Several clinical features distinguished functional to non-functional CD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41405642What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.