ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2026
Who Needs Bright Light and When? Mapping the Interactions of Lighting Environments and Individual Differences in Circadian Light Sensitivity.
Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex and age modulate the relationship between melanopsin-dependent light sensitivity and chronotype.Sleep · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light is the primary circadian time cue, but there are large interindividual differences in how sensitive the circadian system is to light. Currently, it is not well understood how individual differences in light sensitivity interact with real-world light environments to determine sleep and circadian timing. We used a validated computational model to simulate sleep and circadian timing (predicted dim light melatonin onset) under realistic assumptions about light and work schedules. Simulations were repeated varying light sensitivity (translated to equivalent ED50 values for interpretability), as well as evening, morning, and daytime illuminances. Brighter evening light led to later predicted circadian and sleep timing, with this effect being amplified by high light sensitivity. Reducing evening light was particularly beneficial for those with high light sensitivity or a long circadian period. Brighter morning light was beneficial for individuals with a long circadian period, or those with both high light sensitivity and high evening light. However, bright morning light could be maladaptive in individuals with a short circadian period or those with low light sensitivity and low evening light. Brighter daytime light attenuated the delaying effects of evening artificial light across conditions, indicating that increasing daytime light was the most universally beneficial lighting intervention. Our results demonstrate how circadian light sensitivity can be used to tailor individual-level solutions that support optimal sleep and circadian timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.