ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2026
Reflect, Grow, Connect: A Pilot Study on the Potential Benefits of Facilitated Group Supervision for Radiation Therapists.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reflect, Grow, Connect: A Pilot Study on the Potential Benefits of Facilitated Group Supervision for Radiation Therapists.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFacilitated Group Supervision (FGS) involves a group of professionals meeting under the guidance of a supervisor to discuss workplace challenges and promote reflective practice. Previous supervision styles have been trialled for radiation therapists (RTs) in New Zealand with mostly successful results. This pilot study aimed to explore how RTs perceived FGS and compare this with their experiences of previous supervision models.
methodsThis mixed-methods pilot study was conducted at the Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre with seven RTs. Participants met in two groups every four weeks for six months with an independent allied health-trained facilitator. Afterwards, they completed a QUALTRICS questionnaire, including the Clinical Supervision Evaluation Questionnaire, which is 14 Likert scale statements, assessing group process, purpose, and impact. Open-ended questions gathered qualitative data.
resultsAll seven radiation therapists completed the questionnaire, with both qualitative and quantitative results indicating highly positive feedback regarding FGS. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed that participants developed valuable insights and coping strategies, felt the FGS environment enhanced safety and reflection, and found that discussing shared experiences reduced stress. The RTs also preferred FGS to their previous experiences of supervision.
conclusionThe findings showed a positive perception of FGS among all participating RTs, especially experienced RTs who benefitted from the structure and process. Participants reported gaining valuable insights from both the facilitator and peers, which enhanced their skills and helped address clinical challenges. All participants expressed interest in continuing with FGS, agreed that FGS could benefit all RT professionals, and identified it as their preferred method of supervision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.