Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405363›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2026

Validation of an Electronic Health Record Algorithm for Identifying Housing-Related Needs in a Safety-Net Health System.

Nicole C McCann, Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba, Melissa Hofman, Tyler Pauly, Erin Ashe, Youssef Younossi, Michael D Stein, Paul R Shafer, Heather E Hsu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicole C McCannDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4916-4319
Stephanie Ettinger de CubaDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1789-1009
Melissa HofmanResearch Informatics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tyler PaulyDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Erin AsheClinical Data Warehouse, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Youssef YounossiBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael D SteinDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Paul R ShaferDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0654-5821
Heather E HsuBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Improving value-based healthcare delivery for opioid use disorderK01DA054328 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI HSU, HEATHER · 2021 to 2025
$897k
Boston University School of Public HealthNIDA NIH HHS K01 DA054328NIDA NIH HHS K01DA054328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccurate, efficient identification of housing-related needs, including homelessness or housing instability, is crucial for health systems addressing health-related social needs (HRSN). We developed and validated a novel, pragmatic electronic health record (EHR)-based algorithm to identify patients with housing-related needs. STUDY DESIGN AND

settingWe retrospectively evaluated sensitivity and specificity of the housing-related needs algorithm within our safety-net hospital, Boston Medical Center (BMC). DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: The algorithm included six EHR structured data elements tailored to BMC operations, including HRSN screening results. We assessed each element's performance, alone and combined, using 12 months of BMC EHR data among two reference groups: (1) 433 patients with verified housing-related needs at housing program enrollment (2019-2023), and (2) a stratified random sample of 400 patients (200 adult, 200 pediatric) with ≥ 1 primary care medical visit (2022), whose charts we manually reviewed to verify housing status. We calculated algorithm sensitivity in both groups and specificity in the primary care group. PRINCIPAL

findingsWith all data elements included, algorithm sensitivity was 62% (95% CI: 57%-66%) among housing program enrollees and 81% (95% CI: 68%-91%) among primary care patients. Among primary care patients (13% with chart review-verified housing-related needs), specificity was 97% (95% CI: 95%-98%). HRSN screening yielded the highest single-element sensitivity, but screening alone remained limited: 57%-62% of those with verified housing-related needs were detected via screening. Patient address information and diagnostic codes had low single-element sensitivities.

conclusionPragmatic EHR algorithms leveraging structured data elements tailored to local context present an accessible, efficient method for health systems to identify patients with housing-related needs. This is the first study to validate such an algorithm in a safety-net setting; we found it had moderate sensitivity and high specificity. The algorithm identified more housing-related needs than diagnostic codes alone, demonstrating the value of integrated clinical and administrative data. Further algorithm improvements require changes to HRSN screening and EHR documentation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsHousingIll-Housed PersonsNeeds AssessmentSafety-net ProvidersAdultAgedBostonChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificityalgorithmselectronic health recordshealth‐related social needshousing instabilitysafety‐net provider

Identifiers

PMID41405363
PMCPMC12751118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.