Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405305›Full record

SynthesisComputers, informatics, nursing : CIN2026

Nursing Faculty Experiences With Emergent Remote Teaching Transitions: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Jee Young Joo, Megan F Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jee Young JooCollege of Nursing, Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-6781
Megan F LiuSchool of Gerontology Health Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT) No. RS-2023-0020971812982076870001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation on nursing faculty members' experiences with the emergent transition during the COVID-19 pandemic remains limited. PURPOSE: This qualitative systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence from qualitative studies exploring nursing faculty members' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsTwelve qualitative studies were selected from 5 electronic databases and synthesized. This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022371092).

resultsTwelve empirical qualitative studies published between 2021 and 2024 were included. These studies were conducted across various regions, including Australia, Jordan, Pakistan, South Korea, and the United States. On the basis of the experiences of 330 nursing faculty members, 5 common themes were identified: (1) concerns regarding changes in traditional nursing pedagogy; (2) overwhelmingly heavy workloads; (3) acceptance of and coping with the pandemic; (4) the need for continuous and diverse forms of support; and (5) opportunities for improving nursing programs. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThese themes can guide educational administrators in identifying ongoing challenges faced by nursing faculty and reforming nursing education. They also provide a foundation for nursing educational associations and institutions to enhance current teaching approaches and develop new learning strategies in preparation for future public health emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceEducation, NursingFaculty, NursingHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2WorkloadCOVID-19distance learningnurse facultyonline teachingqualitative researchqualitative synthesisqualitative systematic review

Identifiers

PMID41405305
PMCPMC13143364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.