ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2025
A complexity theory-informed COPC approach to evaluation of mining health programmes.
Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional evaluation approaches are often designed for predictable, linear systems and fail to capture the non-linear dynamics of complex community health interventions. Health projects in mining-affected communities are typically fragmented, with limited coordination or responsiveness to socio-ecological realities. This study applied complexity theory, community-oriented primary care (COPC) principles, and used a transdisciplinary approach to assess a health and wellness project in such a setting.
aimTo describe and reflect on the methodology of a complexity-informed assessment of the coherence and contextual alignment of a health and wellness project in mining-affected communities.
settingHealth and wellness projects funded by the Sishen Iron Ore Company Community Development Trust (SIOC-CDT) and implemented across five municipalities in the Northern Cape and Limpopo provinces, South Africa.
methodsA complexity-informed, mixed-methods design was used. Data were gathered through document review, field observation, and 12 key informant interviews with implementing agents, health officials and traditional healers. Community-oriented primary care principles and complexity theory guided iterative analysis and were supported by digital tools.
resultsThe study identified fragmented implementation, limited household engagement and weak data systems. Despite widespread activity, the lack of integration and adaptive strategy limited systemic effectiveness. However, transdisciplinary engagement, adaptive iteration and co-production of knowledge and reflection facilitated institutional learning and practical proposals for change that are integrated and context sensitive, responding to complexities.
conclusionSustainable health system change in complex settings requires integrated, reflexive and locally grounded approaches that move beyond project-based interventions.Contribution: This study demonstrated how complexity theory, transdisciplinarity, and community-oriented primary care principles offer a viable methodological framework for adaptive evaluation and systemic learning in community health and development, contributing to the journal's focus on primary care and community health systems in dynamic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.