Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405106›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2025

Real-world evidence for primary care: A primer on observational research.

Klaus B Von Pressentin, Keneilwe Motlhatlhedi, Malo Musende, Tibor Schuster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Building the next generation of family medicine and primary health care researchers in Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Klaus B Von PressentinDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Family, Community and Emergency Care (FaCE), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town. klaus.vonpressentin@uct.ac.za.
Keneilwe Motlhatlhedi
Malo Musende
Tibor Schuster

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational studies offer a non-experimental and minimally disruptive approach for generating real-world evidence, making them particularly valuable for informing clinical practice, research and health system strengthening - especially in primary care. This article, part of the African Journal of Primary Health Care Family Medicine (PHCFM) methods series, introduces key observational study designs including cross-sectional, cohort and (nested) case-control studies and discusses their application in doctoral-level research. Drawing on historical and contemporary examples, we examine methodological considerations, ethical issues and modern analytical strategies essential for the careful planning and execution of observational research. By integrating conceptual frameworks and causal inference methods, this primer aims to equip researchers at different career stages with a foundational understanding of how to choose and implement observational designs that are both methodologically robust and relevant to primary care contexts.

Indexed as

Observational Studies as TopicPrimary Health CareResearch DesignCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumanscase–control studiescausal inferencecohort studiescross-sectional studieshealth services researchobservational studyprimary careprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID41405106
PMCPMC13150410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.