ArticleThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2025
Developing a FEES service in South Africa: Interdisciplinary reflections for dysphagia care.
Article in The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysphagia is a common and serious condition in critically ill patients, often associated with complications such as aspiration pneumonia and prolonged hospital stays. In South Africa, limited access to instrumental assessments such as fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) hinders accurate diagnosis and management, particularly in public healthcare settings.
objectivesThis study aimed to critically reflect on the process of implementing an interdisciplinary FEES service in a private South African hospital and to explore how these insights could inform dysphagia care across healthcare sectors.
methodA duoethnographic approach was used, involving structured reflection among four co-researchers (three speech-language therapists [SLTs] and one otolaryngologist) who co-developed the FEES service. Data were collected through a recorded focus group and analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Trustworthiness was ensured through triangulation, member checking, and peer debriefing.
resultsSix themes were identified: (1) catalysts for change in dysphagia management, (2) cultivating interprofessional collaboration, (3) navigating logistical and resource constraints, (4) advocating for FEES, (5) enhancing clinical decision-making, and (6) translating FEES into broader contexts. These themes illustrated how FEES improved diagnostic accuracy, fostered interdisciplinary collaboration, and offered scalable potential for public health systems.
conclusionImplementing an interdisciplinary FEES service in a private hospital revealed both challenges and solutions relevant to broader healthcare settings in the South African context.Contribution: Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing offers a cost-effective, accessible diagnostic option for dysphagia care and should be considered for wider adoption within South Africa's National Health Insurance framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.