Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405072›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2025

Current trends and identified gaps in dysphagia research in Africa: A scoping review.

Skye N Adams, Kim Coutts

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Skye N AdamsDepartment of Speech Pathology and Audiology, School of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. skye.adams@wits.ac.za.
Kim Coutts

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of Africa and other resource-limited settings, there is a necessity to address the unique challenges faced by dysphagic patients and to better understand how healthcare professionals, including speech language pathologists (SLPs), can provide contextually and culturally responsive care given our unique healthcare context.

objectivesTherefore, this scoping review aims to map and synthesise evidence relating to dysphagia research in Africa to understand trends as well as research and clinical gaps.

methodAn electronic search of CINAHL, Medline, Academic Search Premier, Global Health, PubMed was conducted in May 2024. Peer-reviewed, English-language articles published between 2015 and 2024 were retrieved. A total of 627 articles were screened, and 61 were included in the final review.

resultsBroadly, 60.7% of the articles stemmed from SA with 62.3% being conducted by SLPs. The articles predominantly focused on practice (n = 39, 63.9%) but also looked at aspects around prevalence, screening, assessment and teaching and learning. Research on dysphagia in Africa highlights the diverse patient populations affected by the condition and the need for interdisciplinary work.

conclusionThere is a strong trend towards patient descriptions and the need for describing local data and developing tools that are appropriate for our contexts, but the gaps strongly highlight the need for multidisciplinary involvement in dysphagia, which is not being conducted.Contribution: This study provides some insight into research being conducted in the African continent, including current trends and areas of future research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDeglutition DisordersSpeech-Language PathologyAfricaHumansResearchAfricadysphagiascoping reviewSouth Africaspeech therapy

Identifiers

PMID41405072
PMCPMC12712721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.