Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41405047›Full record

ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2025

Redefining flow measurement in centrifugal pump: the case for RPM and power consumption-based estimation.

Ignazio Condello

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ignazio CondelloUniversity of Insubria, Via Ravasi, 2, 21100 Varese VA, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-1908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, particularly those utilizing centrifugal pumps (CP), are crucial in sustaining patients with severe cardiac conditions. Traditional flowmeters, integral to these systems, present considerable challenges, including substantial physical bulk, complex wiring, and a dependency on robust backup systems. These challenges become acute in portable applications, where compact, reliable, and discrete solutions are essential for enhancing patient mobility and quality of life. This paper proposes a strategic shift towards integrating RPM (Revolutions Per Minute) and power consumption-based flow estimation as a standard in MCS device design. This approach reduces device complexity, enhances reliability, and diminishes the need for invasive hardware, aligning with broader goals of patient safety and device efficiency. By adopting RPM and power consumption-based estimation, MCS devices can achieve improved ergonomics, fail-safe operational integrity, and enhanced energy efficiency, which are crucial for achieving patient-centric outcomes. This advancement signals a move towards more intelligent, adaptive medical devices that could redefine standards in mechanical circulatory support.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansCentrifugal pumpsFlow estimationMechanical circulatory supportPower consumptionRPM

Identifiers

PMID41405047
PMCPMC12710217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.