Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404981›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2026

An Exact Multiple-Time-Step Variational Formulation for the Committor and the Transition Rate.

Chatipat Lorpaiboon, Jonathan Weare, Aaron R Dinner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chatipat LorpaiboonDepartment of Chemistry and James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6518-0338
Jonathan WeareCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, New York 10012, United States.
Aaron R DinnerDepartment of Chemistry and James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8328-6427

Funding

Rare-event simulation and analysis for elucidating mechanisms of development and diseaseR35GM136381 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Aaron Dinner · 2020 to 2026
$2.2M
Beagle-3: A Shared GPU Cluster for Biomolecular SciencesS10OD028655 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROUX, BENOIT · 2020 to 2020
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136381NIH HHS S10 OD028655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a transition between two stable states, the committor is the probability that the dynamics leads to one stable state before the other. It can be estimated from trajectory data by minimizing an expression for the transition rate that depends on a lag time. We show that an existing such expression is minimized by the exact committor only when the lag time is a single time step, resulting in a biased estimate in practical applications. We introduce an alternative expression that is minimized by the exact committor at any lag time. The key idea is that when trajectories enter the stable states, the times that they enter (stopping times) must be used for estimating the committor and transition rate instead of the lag time. Numerical tests on benchmark systems demonstrate that our committor and transition rate estimates are much less sensitive to the choice of lag time. We show how further accuracy for the transition rate can be achieved by combining results from two lag times. We also relate the transition rate expression to a variational approach for kinetic statistics based on the mean-squared residual and discuss further numerical considerations with the aid of a decomposition of the error into dynamic modes.

Identifiers

PMID41404981
PMCPMC12768578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.