ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2025
Machine learning potentials accurately reproduce vibrational dynamics in complex environments.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vibrational spectroscopy provides a bond-specific view of molecular structure and dynamics, but translating spectroscopic observables to local environments requires the development of accurate models to compute spectroscopic observables from simulations. Recent advances in machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) provide ab-initio-like accuracy at low computational cost, opening new opportunities for developing general, transferable models that can predict spectroscopic observables without system-specific parameterization. Here, we benchmark the performance of the Universal Model of Atoms (UMA), a recently developed MLIP, for predicting IR absorption spectra and picosecond frequency fluctuations of an ester carbonyl in a range of solvents. UMA results are compared with two established approaches: an empirical frequency map parameterized for the ester carbonyl and the semiempirical tight-binding method, GFN2-xTB. We find that UMA reproduces experimental observables with accuracy comparable to traditional methods, while offering broader generality and efficiency.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.