Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404871›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2025

How far on the road? The role of family medicine/general practice in 10 Central and Eastern European countries: A mixed-method study.

Marek Oleszczyk, Aleksander Stepanovič, Norbert Král, Bohumil Seifert, Igor Švab, Janusz Krzysztoń, Natalia Jagiełła, Adam Windak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marek OleszczykDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8042-6188
Aleksander StepanovičDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty University, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-0001
Norbert KrálDepartment of Family Medicine, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5560-5336
Bohumil SeifertDepartment of Family Medicine, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6881-8840
Igor ŠvabDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty University, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-4974
Janusz KrzysztońDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6243-5371
Natalia JagiełłaFamily Physicians' Group Practice Ltd, Krakow, Poland.
Adam WindakDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9844-8935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCentral and Eastern European (CEE) countries began healthcare reforms in the late twentieth century, adopting Family Medicine/General Practice (FM/GP) models. The FATMEE (Family Medicine After Transformation in Middle and Eastern Europe) study in 2012 found this process advanced but incomplete. This study (FATMEE-2) examines current FM/GP development in the CEE region that follows recent social changes and healthcare challenges.

methodsA mixed-methods approach combined literature and dataset review with a Key Informant-based survey using the updated FATMEE questionnaire, exploring the FM/GP role in primary care.

resultsFM/GP is recognised as a separate medical speciality in all countries with robust legal frameworks. Care comprehensiveness varies, with some systems maintaining separate paediatric and adult services, and a lack of gynaecology and obstetrics services in many. Weighted capitation remains the dominant funding model, supplemented by pay-for-performance and fee-for-service schemes. Electronic medical records and teleconsultations are common. Compared to the previous FATMEE study, changes include increased use of digital tools and diversified financing. Primary care structure and professional roles changed little.

conclusionWhile the legal and technological foundations of family medicine in CEE countries have strengthened, comprehensiveness and service integration have limitations. There is a visible progress in infrastructure and digitalisation, but the structural and organisational challenges identified in 2012 largely remain. This may indicate that sustained political commitment and systemic reform - beyond legal acknowledgement and technological improvements - are essential for successful transformation. However, the examples of Estonia and Slovenia prove that under a supportive policy, such a transformation is achievable.

Indexed as

Family PracticeGeneral PracticeHealth Care ReformPrimary Health CareEuropeEurope, EasternHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCentral and Eastern EuropeFamily medicinegeneral practiceprimary care

Identifiers

PMID41404871
PMCPMC12713223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.