ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Evidence for a functional interaction between yeast Pol ε and PCNA in vivo.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA replication relies on precise coordination between proteins, including the sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which encircles DNA to interact with key players in replication and repair. While biochemical studies have demonstrated interactions between PCNA and DNA polymerases δ and ε during DNA synthesis, the functional role of the Pol ε-PCNA interaction in vivo, particularly during leading strand synthesis, remains to be elucidated. To address this question, we employed AlphaFold to model how PCNA interact with four-subunit yeast Pol ε. Our models revealed two distinct points of interaction between Pol ε and PCNA: one at the P-domain and another at a PIP-box, a classical PCNA interaction motif. To validate these findings, we generated mutants that disrupted the Pol ε-PCNA interaction interface. Biochemical assays demonstrated that the PIP-box is critical for this interaction, with the P-domain serving as a secondary contact point. Notably, introducing these mutants into yeast, caused no phenotype in a wild-type background. However, when fewer origins are firing, resulting in longer stretches of leading strand synthesis before forks converge, strains expressing a Pol ε mutant lacking interaction with PCNA showed slower growth. These findings suggest that PCNA enhances the processivity of Pol ε both in vitro and in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.