ArticleNucleic acids research2025
DENetwork unveils non-differentially expressed genes with functional relevance across conditions through information flow perturbation.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting and steering cell dynamics using spatially-informed RNA velocity with veloAgent.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- A literature-guided integrative transcriptomic analysis framework for prioritizing angiogenesis-associated genes across cancers.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Complementary structure of statistical significance and predictive relevance in explainable machine learning-based transcriptomic tissue classification of Hanwoo cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Investigating the association of NBN gene polymorphisms with multiple cancers through statistical meta-analysis and bioinformatics insights.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Review
- DENetwork unveils non-differentially expressed genes with functional relevance across conditions through information flow perturbation.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differential gene expression (DE) analysis of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data is a standard approach for identifying phenotypic differences between conditions. However, traditional DE methods such as DESeq2 focus on expression changes alone, often overlooking non-differentially expressed (non-DE) genes that may play key regulatory roles. This limits their ability to identify upstream drivers of transcriptomic variation. To address this gap, we introduce DENetwork, a network-based approach that prioritizes genes based on their influence on global information flow. Each gene is scored using an in silico knockout strategy that quantifies its impact across the inferred gene network, capturing both DE and non-DE genes with potential functional relevance. DENetwork deciphers intricate regulatory and signaling networks driving transcriptomic variations between conditions with distinct phenotypes. Across simulated and disease-relevant RNA-seq datasets, DENetwork identifies non-DE regulators enriched in known pathways and phenotypic associations, providing mechanistic insights missed by standard DE analysis, with implications for target discovery and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.