ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2026
Mapping Alzheimer's disease heterogeneity with molecular imaging biomarkers.
Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Transforming Growth Factor β Isoforms and Disease Progression in Alzheimer's Disease: Longitudinal Evidence from the ADNI Cohort.Neurology international · 2026Article
- The complement system in Alzheimer's disease: evaluating biomarker potential in a complex neuroimmune context.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Multiscale Approximations to Understand the Complex Role of Microglia in Alzheimer's Disease.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Clinical amyloid and tau positron emission tomography imaging in Alzheimer's disease: image interpretation in the era of anti-amyloid therapies.Current opinion in neurology · 2026Review
- Mapping Alzheimer's disease heterogeneity with molecular imaging biomarkers.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is neuropathologically defined by the buildup of misfolded proteins such as extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) and intracellular tau neurofibrillary tangles. AD also extends beyond these pathological processes, and additional mechanisms such as synaptic dysfunction, microglial activity, astrocytic neuroinflammation play an important role as biomarkers of AD progression. In vivo evaluation and quantification of these molecular processes are possible with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. As disease-modifying therapies are entering clinical use, biomarkers' importance for early diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring of the disease increases.
resultsAβ is the earliest signature of AD which can be measured with PET imaging, followed by tau-PET positivity, which is highly specific and central for staging and longitudinal monitoring. FDG-PET continues to serve as a gold standard for detecting neurodegeneration, challenged by emerging dual-phase PET protocols for amyloid and tau imaging, which integrate perfusion as a measure of neurodegeneration and pathology information in a single session, enhancing diagnostic efficiency. Synaptic density imaging reveals early synaptic loss linked to cognitive performance and decline. Neuroinflammation tracers can visualize microglial and astrocytic activation, contributing to disease onset and progression. Novel PET tracers targeting alpha-synuclein and TDP-43 show great promise for detecting co-pathologies which can contribute to AD clinical heterogeneity.
conclusionPET imaging has advanced the field by enabling visualization of AD-related changes and providing measurable outcomes for clinical trials and disease-modifying therapies. Imaging of related pathologies can further improve diagnostic accuracy and provide important insights into disease heterogeneity. Moving forward, integrating multiple PET biomarkers into personalized diagnostic approaches will be crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.