ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Comparative metagenomics using pan-metagenomic graphs.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying microbial genomic factors underlying human phenotypes is a key goal of microbiome research. Sequence graphs are a highly effective tool for genome comparisons because they enable high-resolution de novo analyses that capture and contextualize complex genomic variation. However, applying sequence graphs to complex microbial communities remains challenging due to the scale and complexity of metagenomic data. Existing multi-sample sequence graphs used in these settings are highly complex, computationally expensive, less accurate than single-sample alternatives, and often involve arbitrary coarse-graining. Here, we present copangraph, a multi-sample sequence-graph-based analysis framework for comprehensive comparisons of genomic variation across metagenomes. Copangraph uses a novel homology-based graph, which provides both non-arbitrary, evolutionary-motivated grouping of sequences into the same node as well as flexibility in the scale of variation represented by the graph. Its construction relies on hybrid coassembly, a new coassembly approach in which single-sample graphs are first constructed separately and are then merged to create a multi-sample graph. We also present an algorithm that uses paired-end reads to improve detection of contiguous genomic regions, increasing accuracy. Our results demonstrate that copangraph captures sequence and variant information more accurately than alternative methods, provides graphs that are more suitable for comparative analysis than de Bruijn graphs, and is computationally tractable. We show that copangraph reflects meaningful metagenomic variation across diverse scenarios. Importantly, it enables significantly better performance than other metagenomic representations when predicting the gut colonization trajectories of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Our results underscore the value of our multi-sample, graph-based framework for comparative metagenomic analyses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.