ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Educational robotics as a strategy for social inclusion and pedagogical intervention in vulnerable youth communities.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In mining regions of Latin America, thousands of children and adolescents are deprived of formal education because of their participation in labor-intensive economic activities. This study addresses how educational robotics can serve as a strategy for both social inclusion and pedagogical intervention in communities with disrupted or nonexistent schooling. Methods: A multi-site intervention was implemented, directly benefiting 2,500 out-of-school or at-risk youth and 250 teachers in rural mining regions. The initiative encompasses the design and construction of educational robots and learning materials by university engineering students. Activities were conducted via project-based learning sessions and teacher training workshops. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating surveys, interviews, and participant observation to assess the impact on motivation, re-engagement with schooling, and pedagogical practices. Results: The findings indicated increased student engagement, enhanced collaborative learning, and a measurable rise in school re-enrollment within the participating communities. Educators reported enhanced confidence in utilizing technological tools and heightened motivation among students. The robots acted as mediating artifacts, facilitating dialogical, hands-on learning experiences and bridging gaps between formal education and local realities. Discussion: The results underscore the potential of educational robotics to serve not just as a pedagogical instrument but also as a transformative vehicle for fostering inclusion, motivation, and equity in marginalized environments. The initiative also demonstrates the significance of university-community collaboration in addressing educational inequality through innovation. Challenges include maintaining long-term impact and scaling the model to other contexts with similar vulnerabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.