ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2025
The spatio-functional cortical representation of muscles innervated by the accessory nerve using nTMS.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The accessory nerve is frequently affected by injury which causes disability due to a loss of function in the trapezius muscle and the sternocleidomastoid muscle. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) may be a valuable tool to quantify aspects of cortical motor reorganization. Methods: nTMS was used to stimulate the motor cortex in 15 healthy volunteers and 3 accessory nerve lesion patients to determine the representation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, trapezius, deltoid, biceps, first dorsal interosseus and zygomatic major muscles. Results: The center of gravitiy (CoG) of the sternocleidomastoid muscle was located between the face (zygomatic major muscle) and hand (first dorsal interosseus muscle). CoG of the trapezius muscle was located superiorly to the hand. Distances to the lateral sulcus differed significantly (median: trapezius muscle 54.9 [9.4] mm, sternocleidomastoid muscle 30.1 [15.7] mm, p < 0.001). The radius (in mm) of the area of the sternocleidomastoid muscle was significantly larger compared to the trapezius (14.3 [5.7] and 11.5 [6.9], p = 0.004). Conclusion: This study describes the detailed spatio-functional representation of trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscle in comparison to four other muscles. Significance: Our data may serve as a baseline for future studies on patients with accessory nerve injuries and a decision-making tool for the indication and timing for reconstructive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.