Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41404492›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026

Impact of Quality Improvement Interventions on the Efficiency of Treatment Planning Timelines in a Modern Proton Therapy Clinic.

Kristen A McConnell, Maria Valladares, Alonso N Gutierrez, Nicole Luther, Zachary Fellows, Lorrie LeGrand, Michael Chuong, Minesh P Mehta, Andrew Wroe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kristen A McConnellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Maria ValladaresDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Alonso N GutierrezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Nicole LutherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Zachary FellowsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Lorrie LeGrandDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Michael ChuongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Minesh P MehtaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Andrew WroeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Following the guidance of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Medical Physics Practice Guideline (MPPG) 4a/4b, AAPM Task Groups 100/275, and American Society for Radiation Oncology's Methods and Materials: Care Paths within our Oncology Information System were used to sequence and track clinical workflows since 2017. Data were mined between 2017 to 2023 to obtain the task's completion and expected completion dates. The task completion offset was calculated to measure the number of days late or early the task was completed. Five quality management interventions were mapped onto control charts for each task to identify the evolution of the practice with each intervention. Average time, SDs, and statistical significance before and after each intervention were also computed. Additionally, total treatment planning times were computed for each patient and histograms, average time, median time, and standard error of the mean were computed and compared by year. Results: Task completion offsets improved from being, on average, 1.59 to 2.63 days late to 0.06 to 2.25 days early, with control charts visually showing the reduction in mean value, reduction in SD, and ultimately, the processes falling more into control. Interventions 1, 2, and 3 showed the strongest overall statistical impact on task completion offsets. Overall, planning timelines improved from a median of 19 days to 11 days. More importantly, the distributions of overall planning time and spread of these times became Gaussian, demonstrating the characteristics of normalized activity patterns, with a reduction in variability. Conclusions: The interventions identified before data collection were well associated with the evolution of the treatment planning timeline data. When quantifying with control charts, there were noted decreased task completion offset variabilities across many examined tasks. Additionally, the data showed shortened overall planning timelines during the time that the complexity of protons plans was increased, newer delivery approaches were made available, and more complex clinical scenarios were incorporated.

Identifiers

PMID41404492
PMCPMC12704197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.